Family Blog.. Rafiqi defends the decisions of the Scientific Council and attacks chameleons
This article was automatically translated from HIBAPRESS, the Arabic version:
This article was automatically translated from HIBAPRESS, the Arabic version:
Muhammad Manfaluti_Heba Press
The expected changes to the Moroccan Family Code have given rise to a sophisticated community debate among stakeholders, professors, academics and policymakers. This public debate has been given ample space to advocate, defend and express opinions, even on social media sites. others sometimes escalated the debate to the level of sarcasm and ridicule, until it was discovered. For some content creators, this discussion is a good opportunity to increase their audience level to make money, even at the expense of a relevant and relevant topic. does not require free discussion with a flavor of sarcasm. The “Darari game” requires in-depth analysis, study and foresight, because what is at stake above all concerns the stability of the institution of marriage, considered the backbone of society.
It is therefore a community project which is the subject of great attention on the part of the royal institution as an emirate of believers, which explains the explicit and clear call of King Mohammed VI, may God protect him, to the Higher Scientific Council to continue its research and diligence in the “problems” linked to family law as the supreme religious body in Morocco.
The Islamic thinker and advisor to the Minister of Justice, “Mohamed Abdel-Wahab Rafiqi”, interacted with this debate around the expected amendments, as he wrote on his Facebook page: “They agree or disagree with the decisions of the Supreme Scientific Council, but it remains constitutionally, legally and politically the institution that supervises religious affairs and guarantees against the emergence of religious chaos and sectarian conflicts, as was the case in the 80s and 90s, when the faithful fought between those who wanted to touch their shoulders and heels. With your shoulders and your heels, lest Satan stand between you, between those who want to pray with peace of mind and comfort without anyone touching them, between those who like to read part of the Quran in congregation after prayers dawn and sunset. , and those who see this as a reprehensible innovation, among those who only pray to the dawn when the dawn appears The light of the morning and the one who sees its fulfillment at the time of washing…”.
My companion added by saying: “But what surprises me is this chameleonism and opportunism with which some people treat the council. You find some people, if they need to strengthen their position, who join the council, force it and do it. by referring to it, until the council comes up with something they disagree with or are happy with, the back of madness turns against them, and it becomes advice. After being an academic board, it changed. from the role of protector of religion, as they said, to the role of destroyer of it. He only bore the burdens of this world and the hereafter because he worked a little hard, so he came. In a way that is not consistent with their doctrine and ideologies…”
Rafiqi stressed that the opinion of the Supreme Scientific Council is a jurisprudence that is subject to right and wrong, and it can be discussed and the council can be called upon to review it, but constitutionally and legally, it is of a binding opinion for a constitutional institution. , and more importantly, it is a national institution and not a WhatsApp group and a Facebook page run by a mix of ideologues from Turkey, Kuwait, Libya, Tunisia, Mauritania and Morocco,” explains Rafiqi .
