Al-Kanbouri: “Organizations care about women because they are the only window to sabotage societies and destroy civilizations. »
This article was automatically translated from HIBAPRESS, the Arabic version:
This article was automatically translated from HIBAPRESS, the Arabic version:
Heba Press – Rabat
Moroccan researcher and academic Idris Al-Kanbouri said that the West’s interest in the women’s issue in general and seeing it as a guarantee of freedom and progress, as well as the desire to change family laws in the Arab and Islamic world, are mainly due to the fact that women are the only gateway to sabotage societies and demolish civilizations, in the context of the ongoing debate on amendments to the Family Code in Morocco, known for resentment of a large part of Moroccan society, who considered him an obvious threat. to the concept of family and the strength of its cohesion.
Al-Kanbouri published a blog post on her personal account on the social networking site Facebook, asking: “Why are women considered a measure of freedom and progress in the world?” Why is the modification of family law in the Arab and Islamic world considered a measure of the development of these societies? Why are women’s movements in the Arab world considered the most influential? Why are the number of organizations dealing with women around the world far greater than those dealing with development and democracy?
He added: “The reason is that women are the only gateway to sabotage societies and destroy civilizations. The concepts of honor, morality, education, noble values and virtue are all linked to women to a large extent. If women fall, these concepts fall in societies. Even for a man, the values of honor, morality, masculinity and dignity are more linked to his role in protecting his wife, daughters and sisters. If these concepts are taken away from him, his personality is lost and his speech. cuckold means a person who is not jealous of these people.
He goes on to explain: “It is for this reason that the materialist and capitalist civilization of the West has placed women at the center of attention, because it is a civilization that wants to spread nudity and pornography, and that she is the daughter of Greek and Roman civilizations. civilizations that worshiped the female body and reproductive organs and carved nude idols as shown in the remaining statues, and this appeared in the 18th century. In the 19th century, painters of the so-called Renaissance era painted Mary and Christ, peace be upon them. , half-naked and naked bodies without underwear. The church did not reject these paintings, but rather hung them on its walls. Like Michelangelo’s paintings.
He went on to speak: “In all modern Western philosophies, women were at the center of capitalism. the cinema. Communism tickled the feelings of the poor by popularizing and disseminating sex and was considered… Marriage is a restriction, and commercial advertising puts women at the center of promoting cars, mattresses, property, housing, aviation, etc., women must appear. .”
Al-Kanbouri believed that modern psychology placed women at the center of its concerns, that sex was the scientific tool of analysis, and that libido was the driving force of history. In their protocols, the Jews made women and sex a means of destroying the world, and when cinema appeared in Egypt in the thirties and forties, and Egypt was primitive, films appeared with salons high-end and naked women to tempt the spectators and make them understand that civilization is nudity.
Kanbouri pointed out that the West and its acolytes in Arab societies have worked to sabotage society’s values outside of laws, and that the sabotage has achieved its goals silently, so that family laws have become ineffective. delay in relation to the reality which they lacked, and reality became a rule. of the delay of the Sharia which did not keep pace, and the reality was reflected in the marriage, so that divorce and problems became widespread. Family problems have become a means of judging family laws, not the other way around.
Al-Kanbouri concluded that the issue of the Family Code is not a matter of 2024 or 1993, but rather an issue that began a hundred years ago, and that one should not look at the vast field of corn, but rather look at the first corn seed planted on this land, because the field begins with a small seed that no one can see holding it between two fingers like a grain of sand.
