The deputy deputy of the king: “preventing the donor is a duty to travel, a procedure related to judicial research”.

This article was automatically translated from HIBAPRESS, the Arabic version:

This article was automatically translated from Hibapress, the Arabic version:

Heba Press

Certain social networks and websites have disseminated allegations of ban (M.) to leave the national territory, which included a set of contradictory information on the reasons for this prohibition and its real and legal foundations.

In this regard, we ask three questions to Mr. Zuhair Al -harash, the first assistant of the king’s agent at the Court of First Instance in Rabat, to provide clarifications concerning this case:

– What are the reasons behind the prevention of M. (MM) to travel?

All the deceptive allegations and allegations of this issue are not linked to reality, and I would like to emphasize that this question is not linked to any reason linked to its political or scientific activity or to its practice of one of the rights guaranteed to him legally.

The case is linked to the interview with suspicion of having committed an act which is criminalized and punished by the law on money laundering, because the research has shown that the person concerned has received a set of significant financial transfers from abroad, and it has also been found that he has a certain number of real estate which have formed the question of permits liable to suspicion in accordance with article 18 of law n ° 43.05.

According to this, public prosecutions ordered preliminary research in the matter, and after having exhausted his procedures, the person concerned was submitted before the King’s prosecutor to the Court of First Instance of Rabat, who decided to submit a petition to carry out an investigation into his confrontation in order to suspect that he has initiated actions that the criminal is in accordance with classes 574-1, 574-2, 574-3.

I would like to clearly say that the judiciary, in order to clarify the elements of the truth, is to ensure that all the legal methods available to exhaust the investigation procedures, especially since these procedures are linked to international judicial actions which have been led abroad, and that the results which he will obtain from these procedures require the presence of the person concerned in order to confront him concluded.

– on the basis of this preliminary research, which was ordered by public prosecution, where the arrival of research in this case and what is legal support for travel prevention?

The person of the person concerned is still popular with the investigating judge who made a decision to close the borders and withdraw the passport against him in accordance with article 142 of the criminal procedure law, which stats in its second paragraph that it is possible to “the need to search for the closers and Ensure that the accused do not escape throughout the Search Period ”, in contrast to what is promoted from false information about the Legal basis to prevent the person concerned from Traveling, as the article is the aforememented is grants to the investigating judge the possibility of Issuing the Aforementioned Order Preparatory Investigation Phase Without Being Coupled With Any Legal or Limited Period in A Certain Period of Time, and the Provisions of Article 160 of the Code of Penal Procedure Are not Applied To Him As Stated in the Allegations of The Person Smeded, Knowning That It Remains for the Latter and His Defense Is the Full Right to Direct the Rulers That the Law Authorizes to Appeal these decisions before the competent judicial authorities instead of promoting misleading allegations.

Is this problem linked to royal forgiveness from which the person concerned benefited?

First of all, I would like to confirm that the person concerned has all the rules of a fair trial and, as he previously underlined, the judicial power ensures that the investigation procedures are quickly exhausted.

In addition, membership of the principle of the rule of law requires the first way of respecting the judiciary and legal procedures in force, which are applied and taken against all suspects without exception, instead of promoting allegations which lack the legal basis which supported it, with the aim of illegal influence during a question which is always in the eyes of the judiciary.

Looking the Royal Pardon That the Person concerned befied from, the ISSU is not related to the Issue of the public Lawsuit in Force in its confrontation for the Misdemeanor of money laundering, Whose phases are Still Ongoing in Front of the Investigation Room with the Guarantee of Confidentiality, Money Laundering – The Subject of the Preparatory Investigation Procedure in the right of the person concerned – is considering an independent crime for the original crime that is related to criminal procedures, and not belonging to him legal, unlike the errors promoted in this context.

.Hibawts {display: inine-flex; Align-Eeetems: Center; Justification-contained: Center; Background color: # 25D366; padding: .5rem 1.25rem; Police size: 1st; Link-Height: 1.5rem; Police-point: 500; -Tw-tox-opacity: 1; Transition time:. 7s; Transition timing funiating: Cubic-Bezier (. 4.0, 2.1); Width: 49%; } .HIBAWTS SPAN {Color: #FFFFFS; } Padding: 10px; Border-Radius: 10px; Color: #FFF; Police: Bold; Display: inheritance; Marge pot: 5px; } Padding: 10px; Border-Radius: 10px; Color: #FFF; Police: Bold; Display: inheritance; Marge pot: 5px; } Padding: 10px; Border-Radius: 10px; Color: #FFF; Police: Bold; Display: inheritance; } Width: 3rd; Height: 2m; ADIGNE VERTICAL: Middle; Display: online block; Marge: Var (-google -News-icon-Margin); } Url (“https://ar.hibapress.com/wp-constrent background-size: auto; background-size: 2m 2em;} url (” https://ar.hibapress.com/wp-content/themes/hibapress/hiba.svg?6.52#sshare- Telegramgramgramgramgramgramgramgramgramgramgrantargramess-size: Auto; last news from Heba Bress on x