This article was automatically translated from HIBAPRESS, the Arabic version:
This article was automatically translated from Hibapress, the Arabic version:
Heba Press – Rabat
The series of controversial actions continues from certain famous social media, which often exceed the limits of the law, taking advantage of their digital renown, without responsibility or supervision.
In an incident that caused the dissatisfaction of public opinion, the young Abdul -Ilah, known as the “whale shopping” a few days ago, triggered behavior described as “rabbits” against the security men of the city of Marrakech.
“Mall of the Whale” challenged the security forces while they were their duty and tried to photograph them without obtaining a prior authorization, saying that his fame had authorized him to do what he wanted when he was threatening to contact their managing director, Abdul Latif Al -hamoushi.
The security men did not look for the Whale Arabs, before stopping and transferring to the police station to listen to their statements, while the public accusation ordered its follow -up in the event of release.
In a similar incident, Kawthar Bamo aroused generalized controversy after filming a group of stray dogs in a manner described as “exposure”.
Kawthar Bamo exploded in a video published on his account on “Instagram”, anger in a street due to the campaign to collect stray dogs.
Pamo attacked the managers of this campaign in one of the streets, where she tried to prevent them from taking a dog wandering from the street, saying: “Gadi Nadia is with me at home. »»
Activists accused Kawthar Bamo of trying to exploit the situation to obtain an additional digital interaction and renown.
Activists have spoken of death and injuries of a certain number of citizens suffering from sustainable injuries and disabilities due to wandering dog attacks, calling on Bamu to use their fame to demand the protection of the citizen of this danger instead of attacking the authorities.
Celebrities of the celebrities of “social media” have raised deep questions among citizens, is the reputation of which is a means of overcoming legal and institutional controls? Where is the role of the authorities in the confrontation of this “digital orgy” which threatens the cohesion of society and respect for its institutions?
The followers believe that the accounts of all those who violate the law, whatever their reputation, is the only way to guarantee respect for institutions and the reflection of public space and to end the violations of this group, which has become a popularity as a result of the reduction of law and institutions.
.Hibawts {display: inine-flex; Align-Eeetems: Center; Justification-contained: Center; Background color: # 25D366; padding: .5rem 1.25rem; Police size: 1st; Link-Height: 1.5rem; Police-point: 500; -Tw-tox-opacity: 1; Transition time:. 7s; Transition timing funiating: Cubic-Bezier (. 4.0, 2.1); Width: 49%; } .HIBAWTS SPAN {Color: #FFFFFS; } Padding: 10px; Border-Radius: 10px; Color: #FFF; Police: Bold; Display: inheritance; Marge pot: 5px; } Padding: 10px; Border-Radius: 10px; Color: #FFF; Police: Bold; Display: inheritance; Marge pot: 5px; } Padding: 10px; Border-Radius: 10px; Color: #FFF; Police: Bold; Display: inheritance; } Width: 3rd; Height: 2m; ADIGNE VERTICAL: Middle; Display: online block; Marge: Var (-google -News-icon-Margin); } Url (“https://ar.hibapress.com/wp-constrent background-size: auto; background-size: 2m 2em;} url (” https://ar.hibapress.com/wp-content/themes/hibapress/hiba.svg?6.52#sshare- Telegramgramgramgramgramgramgramgramgramgramgrantargramess-size: Auto; last news from Heba Bress on x
