The PJD denounces Wahbi’s management of structural reforms linked to justice

HIBAPRESS-RABAT

The General Secretariat of the Justice and Development Party (PJD) Abdelilah Benkirane expressed his disapproval of what he described as “strange and irresponsible behavior of Abdellatif Wahbi, Minister of Justice, in his management of the results of the commission responsible for proposing the reform of the Family Code, and its non-compliance with the methodology set by His Majesty the King, may God help him, and its anticipation of the official announcement of the results of the commission’s work.

The strange and irresponsible behavior of Abdellatif Wahbi, Minister of Justice, in his treatment of the conclusions of the commission responsible for proposing the reform of the family code, and his non-compliance with the methodology determined by His Majesty the King, may God Protects him, and his anticipation of the official announcement of the conclusions of the commission’s work, which confirms the carelessness and lack of responsibility with which he treats a number of important files which require a lot of sobriety and responsibility. »

The General Secretariat of the PJD considered that the strange, reprehensible and hasty way in which the Minister of Justice treats structural projects related to the administration of justice, such as civil and criminal procedure, in addition to offending Parliament and the legislative process in our country, will lead to the issuance of dysfunctional texts which do not respect the fundamental guarantees enshrined in the Constitution for citizens and will not answer the real questions raised by practice.

On this occasion, the General Secretariat of the PJD drew attention to the extreme importance of these two texts, because they are closely linked to the establishment of conditions for fair trials, to the administration of justice, to the application of the law and the guarantee of the rights and freedoms stipulated in the Constitution.

He also warns of the great danger of this erroneous approach, and calls for a broader participatory approach and the need to listen to the opinions of professionals and stakeholders in the judicial field, by submitting these projects, before their adoption, to the competent institutions so that they can give their advisory opinion on them.