This article was automatically translated from HIBAPRESS, the Arabic version:
This article was automatically translated from Hibapress, the Arabic version:
Heba press_ fez office
Yesterday, on Thursday, February 6, the conference palace attended at a controversial moment during the intervention of the Al-Fakhari survivor, president of the traditional industry chamber in the Fez-Meknes region, where he seemed confused and stammered while delivering his speech in front of the participants, which raised a wave of comments and questions about his preparation for such official events.
A clear confusion before the participants, during his speech during a meeting attended by a number of institutions concerned by traditional industry and traditional manufacturers, Al -fakhari seemed unable to speak, hesitated to pronounce certain sentences And occurred in several linguistic errors, it has aroused the attention of the participants.
The case was complicated by the presence of eminent official personalities, including Hassan Saadi, state writer in charge of traditional industry, and other personalities, which made the situation more embarrassing for the president of the Bedroom.
This low performance triggered comparisons between Al -fakhari and its predecessor, Abdul -Malik Al -Boutia, which, although it is only on the main certificate, had a strong and confident presence, which made it in Measurement of communicating effectively with traditional manufacturers and civil servants.
This has increased criticism that affected the current president, because some have seen that “academic qualifications do not necessarily mean the capacity to drive or effective communication”.
This event put in the foreground the discussion on the extent of the efficiency of civil servants in the assumption of public posts, and the importance of good preparation before addressing public opinion, in particular in Official opportunities that require a degree of control and ability to persuade.
He also highlighted the need to improve public speaking skills and communication for civil servants in order to avoid such embarrassing situations that can affect their image and the image of the institutions they represent.
The question remains: does this incident reflect the weakness of individual preparation, or is it an indication of a deeper crisis in the criteria of choice of civil servants? Upcoming events can answer this question, but what is certain is that public opinion has become more aware of the importance of efficiency in public affairs management, and that performance in front of the public has become a major element in the assessment of civil servants, whatever their paper qualifications.
