This article was automatically translated from HIBAPRESS, the Arabic version:
This article was automatically translated from Hibapress, the Arabic version:
Heba Press-Youssef judged
The Algerian delegation celebrated the victory of its candidate with the post of vice-president of the African Union Commission, but this celebration aroused generalized controversy, because this position formally affected and does not affect the strategic policies of the continent .
On the other hand, the delegation of Djibouti did not show the same hospitality after his candidate won the presidency of the African commission, stressing the difference in the way of estimating the continental positions.
It appears through the reactions of the Algerian delegation that the Algerian regime does not really pay attention to the interests of the African continent, but focuses only on the victory of false points in its continuous fight with Morocco.
This behavior reflects the abnormal psychological phenomenon suffered by the Algerian regime, which raises doubts about its true intentions to strengthen the interests of the African Union.
By comparing Algerian celebrations and Gitoy’s true victory, fundamental teams appear in diplomatic concepts. Djibouti, whose candidate, led by the Commission, has never celebrated, reflects the emphasis on the interests of the African continent instead of exporting empty political messages.
Although the post of vice-president of the African Union Commission is an administrative position which has no significant impact on international policies, the Algerian regime continues to exaggerate the celebration of this position. This behavior raises the question of the severity of Algeria to provide the interest of the African continent for its close interests.
This obliges Africans to know what Algeria does, because its current policies cause great evil in the interests of the continent. While Algeria seeks behind formal victories, he must realize that this absurdity can lead to the collapse of the long -term Algerian state, if there is no real intellectual change, in particular to the light of the dictatorial rule.
