This article was automatically translated from HIBAPRESS, the Arabic version:
This article was automatically translated from Hibapress, the Arabic version:
Heba Press- Abdul Latif Baraka
Mustari’s error in the case of the Villa “Lucin” in Marrakech made a general debate on human rights in legal and legal circles.
The case began when the local authorities made the decision to demolish the famous villa in the Al-Nakheel district, due to the lack of respect for certain legal procedures related to construction, but this decision was marred by several gaps in leaders, according to what the Observatory of Human Rights has referred in an official communication issued by copies of “Heba Press”.
The communication issued by the Observatory of Human Rights highlights the existence of a linguistic error in the measures taken by the competent authorities, because it indicated that the decision does not follow the appropriate legal methods which guarantee the right to defense for owners of goods in such cases, this error in the implementation of the law created a wave of criticism, whether by the defenders of human rights considered that this behavior reflects the lack of respect for the guarantees of justice.
In the same context, the observatory underlined the need to correct this Mustarbiyah error, because it expressed its concern about the impact of these decisions on the stability of property rights and the protection of individuals against arbitrary administrative procedures.
He stressed that this incident could open the door to a number of similar problems, which obliges local authorities to accurately follow legal procedures to avoid repeating these mistakes.
In the same communication, the relevant commission of human rights called for the need to allow citizen the right to challenge these decisions before their implementation, in a framework which guarantees a balance between the public interest and the rights of individuals to protect their goods.
In addition to this controversy, the observatory addressed the importance of effective judicial control over administrative decisions, indicating that local authorities must have transparency in these questions. At the same time, he underlined the need to take decisive positions to guarantee respect for the rights of citizens in all areas.
Will the question remain: will the authorities reconsider the procedures followed in this case and undertake to correct the legal errors committed, or will the question remain a scarecrow in the history of Marrakech tourism? The answer remains in the hands of the authorities concerned which must take the necessary measures.
