This article was automatically translated from HIBAPRESS, the Arabic version:
This article was automatically translated from Hibapress, the Arabic version:
Heba Press – Rabat
The Court of Appeal of the City of Rabat closed its doors on Monday evening May 26, the curtains of the case which occupied national public opinion, known to the media under the name of “case of slap the temara”, where it decided to support the preliminary decision against the main Shaima defendant and condemned its imprisonment of two years.
The session, which was closely followed by the media, defined the assertion by the judiciary of the decisions rendered by the Court of First Instance in Tamara last April, which included four subscribers in this file, led by Shaima, which faced accusations linked to “insult and violence against a public employee during his functions”, and was paid for “deobedience”.
Details of call decisions:
Shaima: two years’ imprisonment.
Her husband: one year in force, for “insult”, while paying disobedience.
The husband’s brother (the third defendant): six months in force, with his acquittal of crimes and his participation in violence.
The fourth defendant: six months’ imprisonment with the same accusations and circumstances.
The court also supported the financial fine on the right of Shaima’s husband, which is specified in 7,000 dirhams in favor of an element of the auxiliary forces which were within the parts of the file.
The case is due to an incident that occurred during the intervention of local authorities in Temara, where Shaima was accused of verbal and physical attack against the head of the region while exercising his functions, which triggered a wave of controversy after the propagation of videos of the accident through the social media platforms.
Despite the abdication of Skhirat workers, Temara, representative of the Ministry of the Interior, the trial and his request for symbolic dirhams, public prosecution continued to follow the follow -up of the nature of the actions undertaken.
The presence of followers of the followers was remarkable in the courtroom, where they lived moments of anticipation and anxiety throughout the session which extended over hours, interspersed with long defense pleadings, without leading to relieve decisions.
The case, which started with a video, ended with an effective decision of appeal, ended the hopes of the defense of defendants in the reduction of sanctions, and re-repair the limits of expression and confrontation with authority again.
.Hibawts {display: inine-flex; Align-Eeetems: Center; Justification-contained: Center; Background color: # 25D366; padding: .5rem 1.25rem; Police size: 1st; Link-Height: 1.5rem; Police-point: 500; -Tw-tox-opacity: 1; Transition time:. 7s; Transition timing funiating: Cubic-Bezier (. 4.0, 2.1); Width: 49%; } .HIBAWTS SPAN {Color: #FFFFFS; } Padding: 10px; Border-Radius: 10px; Color: #FFF; Police: Bold; Display: inheritance; Marge pot: 5px; } Padding: 10px; Border-Radius: 10px; Color: #FFF; Police: Bold; Display: inheritance; Marge pot: 5px; } Padding: 10px; Border-Radius: 10px; Color: #FFF; Police: Bold; Display: inheritance; } Width: 3rd; Height: 2m; ADIGNE VERTICAL: Middle; Display: online block; Marge: Var (-google -News-icon-Margin); } URL (“https://ar.hibapress.com/wp-constrent background-size: auto; background-size: 2m 2em;} url (” https://ar.hibapress.com/wp-constrent-same-size; heba press on Whatsapp.
