Heba Press: Inezgane
Heba Press has learned from well-informed sources that the morbid lobby is these days in a race against time to expand its real estate assets and exploit it at astronomical prices in the town of Inezgane.
This situation has prompted a certain number of collective actors to address strong criticism against the Collective Council of the City of Inezgane, against a backdrop of illegal transformation of the historic public square “Bir Anzran” into a parking lot, while it is a public square according to the urban development design of the city of Inezgane.
They called the decision unreasonable and wrong, especially since the square was, until recently, an outlet for residents of the city, which lacks adequate spaces and green areas.
They added that it would have been preferable for the group to rehabilitate the said square in such a way as to meet the aspirations and needs of the inhabitants in terms of green spaces, or at least to transform it into any other type of facility benefiting the general public. audience. , instead of forcing citizens to pay taxes in front of their stores and at home.
It is known that the historic public square “Bir Anzeran”, in the current urban development concept of the city of Inezgane, is “not a sanctuary” and is not included in the rental contract of the city sanctuary . the group seized on the residents’ right to park in front of houses and cafes, as if it had the right to privilege each zone and the urban territorial level of the Panzkan as a whole.
As a reminder, many companies in the region and the region have repeatedly accused the local authority of the city of Inezgane of excluding it from all parking and bicycle rental transactions, after having imposed unfair conditions and impossible which constitute the file for participation in the transactions, and these conditions were made at the request of a competitor and at the expense of the rest of the competitors with the aim of awarding it to one of the “lucky ones” in flagrant violation of the legal requirements, owners of. some quotes, particularly from young people, also felt that there are sneaky practices aimed at excluding the greatest number of competitors in exchange for opening the way to those who have been used to benefiting from these agreements for years to the detriment of others.
The question everyone in the region is asking about the historic square-turning-a-sanctuary scandal is: Who gave permission to change the development design and turn a historic public square into a sanctuary? The problem here lies in the skills gap between the Inezgane group and all those involved in the change in development design. And who is responsible for the change in land use planning by the sole leader of the community of Inezgane, while we find a multiplicity of stakeholders including the Directorate of Urban Planning, the Agency of Urban Planning, the Regional Inspection of Housing, Construction and National Territorial Preparation, the Regional Inspection of Housing, Construction and National Territorial Preparation, the authority represented by the Ministry of the Construction of work or region, the group concerned and the external services affiliated to the ministerial sectors concerned by this illegal change.
